top of page

Lubartów, June 2018

One (for), but two people.

    After the loss in the Administrative Court, we sent again the application for the scope of activities of the officials of the City Office in Lubartów. Where did the conviction come from that it will succeed this time? And why have we lost, even though we have basically won?

It's easy.

We just sent a new-old application. To which we already have an answer. This time, the Office does not claim that it is not public information, internal document, etc. This is probably already clear after our annual correspondence.

They write that they will process the application by August 18, because it is extensive and the scope of activities must be analyzed in terms of the provisions on the protection of personal data.

How does this relate to losing in court?

All in all, we have experience, because we've had a pretty stupid discussion about a badly addressed petition before.

One person and two functions, so you can sit on two chairs with one butt.  

As it turns out, not only the Mayor / Head of the City Hall can. Some of us can too.

This position was adopted by the Administrative Court in the matter of the scopes of activities requested by us. We wanted to know what exactly which official is responsible for. The request for public information was signed by the president, but as a natural person. So a complaint to the court cannot be filed by the foundation in the person of the president (Sic!). Why to the court? The application was sent on May 5, 2017, so I guess that's enough.

In our opinion, as we wrote, it is not Mania who is to accept incoming documents, but the person employed in the position - customer service. The fact that Ms Mania is doing this is solely due to the fact that she was employed in the above-mentioned position. And it is not about any particular Mr. Manie in this case. With all due respect to them.

About what  happened with the application, you can read here .

Odpowiedź UM Lubartów_zakresy czynności
bottom of page