Lubartów, February 2018
What's in it for me?
People often ask themselves: What's in it for me?
We are no different from the general public. We also ask ourselves such questions.
And there is nothing wrong with that, especially with regard to the joint property.
Except that "had" can mean both a profit and a liability.
The last information in Channel S (edition 384, 02/02/2018) concerned the issue of increases in fees for heat energy introduced by Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej and suggestions on how to deal with them by the authorities of the Housing Cooperative.
More specifically, the PEC President's proposal, in what amount they should collect an advance payment from the cooperatives.
We would like to remind you that the Housing Cooperative is a strategic client of PEC, which in turn is a sole-shareholder company of the city. To simplify - the President of PEC argues in the announcement that the increases are unnecessarily introduced by the authorities of the Cooperative, and: "(...) The actions of the authorities of the above-mentioned Cooperative may only prove the lack of elementary knowledge of what the price of heat results from and how it is calculated, or the ill will of the authorities of the Cooperative aimed at undermining the trust in PEC Lubartów Sp. z o. o. (...). "
The President of the Housing Cooperative in Informacje referred to both the communiqué and PEC's proposal regarding the amount of the advance payment.
We are not cooperatives, so here comes the above-mentioned question: What will I get out of it?
Or a similar one, present among non-cooperatives: What do I care about the Cooperative-PEC conflict?
Przedsiębiorstwo Energetyki Cieplnej in Lubartów is a municipal company. It employs about 50 people, and its largest client is the Housing Cooperative.
Who do you think will ultimately bear the costs of terminating this contract? Who will realistically cover any loss in business or will bear the cost of any (group) layoffs?
These are questions of the genre - what's of it and what's of me.
For now, after seeing the Information, our questions to the PEC concern the cost of this "information offensive".
